AirbusA320-200 vs. Boeing 787-9 versus : Airbus A320-200 versus Boeing 787-9; 37.57 m: 123 ft 3 in: length: 63.00 m: 206 ft 8 in: 34.10 m: 111 ft 10 in: wingspan: 60.17 m: 197 ft 5 in: 122.60 m 2: 1,320 ft 2: wingarea: 347.00 m 2: 3,735 ft 2: 11.70 m: 38 ft 5 in: height: 16.90 m: 55 ft 5 in: 2: engines: 2: 120 kN: 27,000 lb f: thrust per 737v A320 . For any pilots who have flown both types or experienced them on some level which would you prefer to fly and why? A330 and A380 and two Boeings,747 and 737. Boeing is nice to fly and Airbus is nice to work in. Boeing is a proper airplane and Airbus is a proper office.Weread that MCAS on the Boeing 737 MAX was needed because of the new, bigger, heavier engines of the MAX compared to the previous 737 versions. Airbus A320 was designed as a fly by wire aircraft, from the get-go, the Boeing 737 was designed in a different era, and manual mode had no real computer control (except automatic trims &
Analysis The Airbus A320neo Vs Boeing 737 MAX – Which Plane Is Best? By Luke Bodell and Simple Flying Staff. Updated At102 ft (31 m), the -500 is similar in length to the original 737-200 and can fly 110 to 132 passengers. The 110 ft (33.4 m) long -300 can seat 126 to 149 passengers while the 120 ft (36.4 m) long -400 accommodates 147 to 168 seats. It competed with the MD-80 family, then with the Airbus A320 which prompted Boeing to update its offer with the 9VMJf6f.
